Skip to content

Use case

Policy Q&A with citations and version checks

Help staff answer questions from approved policies, with each answer linked to the clause it came from and a named owner who signs off the reading.

Definition

Policy owners, operations teams and governance reviewers who repeatedly answer questions from an approved policy set.

01

Who it is for

Policy owners, operations teams and governance reviewers who repeatedly answer questions from an approved policy set.

It is not appropriate when a deterministic policy rule, mandatory form or human authorisation must produce the decision directly.

02

Representative inputs

Agree the source set and expected behaviour before transferring documents through an approved route.

  • Current policies and procedures
  • Archived or superseded versions for conflict tests
  • Ownership and effective-date metadata
  • Known-answer and no-answer questions
03

Workflow

Follow a fixed sequence of steps, with a named reviewer at the end.

  • Define the policy set and named owner
  • Reconcile ingestion and version metadata
  • Ask the pre-written question set
  • Inspect citations, conflicts and missing support
  • Record a reviewer decision and corrective action
04

Example output to review

Synthetic example: an answer identifies the current retention period, cites the controlling clause and separately flags a superseded policy that states a different period.

Open each cited passage, confirm the document version and check that every material condition in the answer is supported.

05

Permission and deployment considerations

Scope access by organisation, department and document set. Test whether revoked users, archived versions and connector deletions behave as expected in the selected deployment.

06

Failure cases and human judgement

The policy owner decides the controlling interpretation, publishes corrections and remains responsible for advice or operational exceptions.

  • Current and archived policies conflict
  • The answer exists only in a table or appendix
  • The document set contains no approved answer
  • A citation supports part but not all of a sentence
07

Evaluation criteria

Score each measure separately and keep what each reviewer decided. Do not collapse the test into a single made-up score.

  • Known-answer support
  • Citation correctness
  • Material-claim coverage
  • Version selection
  • No-answer and conflict behaviour
  • Reviewer usefulness

What this page does not prove

  1. B1The example output shows the method. It is not a customer result.
  2. B2The workflow does not replace authorised professional judgement.
  3. B3Source quality, configuration and deployment boundaries affect behaviour.
  4. B4We make no performance or time-saving claim without an agreed protocol and the results behind it.

Evaluate policy Q&A with citations and version checks

Share the workflow and any constraints you can discuss openly. We agree how documents move before anything starts.